Hacker News Reader

My meatbag or robot scored it as likely a robot and most likely Claude.

https://meatbag.atomic14.com/

I just used it on 4 texts. The 1st version was the output from my first (chatGPT) prompt. The 4th was the last prompts of "reduce, make it less AI, etc" of the same original request/output.

In all cases it was meatbag. In the 1st case gave chatGPT 0.35. The remaining ones were much lower.

EDIT: I didn't ask just to generate some text. The original prompt was very specific, which is most of the time the way I use LLMs anyways. Probably it catches better the "hey just generate this email...".

There's no borderline about it.

When the density of italicized words is about 1:1, I'm out.

Most like AI generated? If you can't tell then what's the problem?

Wise people tend not to talk in absolutes, because they always realize they might be wrong.

Ignorant people are always certain.

always?

I am one of the ignorant ones, after all, so I'm probably wrong on this. Wait...

This is just a rephrasing of the Dunning-Krueger effect, but quantized to a binary domain (ignorant vs wise).

Strong opinions…

def. AI-assisted, both content and style style/nav. Content-wise, it looks legit, but with that amount of stuff, it's nearly impossible to say for sure.

Not slope tho!