Coconut oil jet fuel matches kerosene's efficiency in engine tests
studyfinds.com
studyfinds.com
More egregiously FAME is a polar solvent that eats your elastomers, even some fluoroelastomers. It will also attack your polysulfide tank sealant. The remark that it's "technically feasible" to decrease oxygen through hydrogenation is not at all sufficient. Now you're into requiring catalyst beds and a hydrogen plant which makes this much less appealing. Plus ester instability when you sink heat into fuel. Plus freeze point. This is literally a tracked contaminant banned above mg/kg levels that doesn't even have very good properties otherwise they want to run as a major constituent of fuels.
edit: thanks for the downvote. I should've said "Maybe it's time to _invest into developing_ new sealing materials?" ;)
Remember when George W Bush signed into law the corn ethanol bill. Corn tripled in price within 8 years. Fuel didn't get cheaper. In fact it cost more to produce the ethanol.
Edit: The US created biofuel subsidies a few years ago and it’s led to poor use of land with questionable climate impact. It’s effectively become a wealth transfer to support poor rural American communities, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing but there’re probably more effective ways to do that intentionally.
It's also very not true that farmers are poor in the US (median household income about 30% greater than general population). This mindset is like a century old.
My immediate reaction to this is: it's probably a wewlth transfer to the few landlords owning the land and probably charging higher rent, not to the communities.
Of course I haven't analysed the data. If I am wrong, hopefully someone will feel compelled to correct me.
How common is farm landlords?
[1] - https://nypost.com/2023/11/25/business/how-bill-gates-quietl...
[2] - https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Re...
A few years ago? Corn ethanol subsidies have been a thing for my entire life.
It's a net-negative fuel. Costs more fuel to produce than it provides. It's literally just a way to waste water, farmland, huge quantities of diesel (burned by engines exempt from any sort of emissions), labor, etc.
What changed is that ethanol has been forced by regulations into more and more use over time. That has driven up demand for corn, and one of the worse side effects is that a major food staple for Mexico has gone up dramatically in price.
> effectively become a wealth transfer to support poor rural American communities,
If you think that's bad, stop and think for a moment about what purpose the US military serves for rural America, both directly through personnel but also indirectly through all the incredibly wasteful equipment, service, and supply contracts.
The US military's primary reason for existence is force projection, but its secondary is keeping rural American's uneployment from skyrocketing.
Adding some numbers for a base line. (Note all of these numbers are almost the upper limit of a well managed farm with very good cultivars)
Best yielding palms yield ~300 nuts per pals at 70 palms/acre.
at 750g a dehusked nut with 20% oil yield
You get ~2.3 tonnes oil/acre.
For reference an a321neo burns around 2,300 kg of fuel per hour when cruising
I <3 you HN, never change.
If you thought habitat destruction from palm oil was bad, that would be nothing compared to coconut oil making up any significant fraction of jet fuel.
Around 40 million flights per year.
40 trillion coconuts required for all flights, or 1000x current production.
To scale up coconut production we need 12 billion hectares, or 80% of the Earth's surface for coconut trees.
We need 100k cubic km of water per year, or twice the renewable fresh water on this planet.
Ok cool. We will need to terraform Mars before we can fly by coconut.
Finally I understand the mad billionaire's plan.
This isn't the future I want.
biofuels won't work. they take too much land and are inefficient in terms of producing.