Take note of the qualifier entirely. If you're working with an agent steering it to produce the results you want, it would be an entirely different story.
Take note of the qualifier entirely. If you're working with an agent steering it to produce the results you want, it would be an entirely different story.
> Neither mere prompting nor the selection between several AI suggestions is sufficient as a human creative contribution.
which reads like you actually have to contribute by modifying the output from the system, i.e. prompts/inputs to the system do not count as a human contribution.
same thing applies to sampling in music. if i change enough of a sample as to make it unrecognizable, then i don't need to worry about registering/licensing the sample.
otherwise you can still prompt your agent things, but any output falls under public domain.
since this hype wave started some people have been saying don’t use these tools in an environment where you’re dealing with proprietary IP. did anyone listen? no. because shiny.
> Munich Local Court has held that
Local Court in Germany is the equivalent of the Magistrates Court in the UK or Australia.
Definitely not the arbiter of ultimate truth.