Strong dislike for papers that tell me what to do in the title, especially when even the paper admits a loose correlation of the intermediate tokens compared to solution correctness.
My solutions work and they speak for themselves.
From [1]: "Position papers make an argument for a viewpoint or perspective about what should be done [...]"
I understand the sentiment, and I also use the "thinking" traces as insight, but wouldn't you want your solutions to be based upon a good understanding? If the correlation is weak, then our solution is also weak.