Looks like someone stole LinearMouse's code and vibed it better .
https://linearmouse.app/zh-CN/
What makes you say this is stolen from LinearMouse?
Example 1: “as a JavaScript front-end developer working with React and node, I think LLMs save 500 hours a week and are better than anyone on our team.” <— easy to believe
Example 2: “as a backend Erlang developer working on life-critical systems the inconsistent output makes LLMs dangerous and the code is tidy but terrible at scale.” <— fully congruent with the first example
As an iOS developer, I have yet to see two different teams agree on best practices, architecture, or code style, and the only reason I've seen anyone agree on UI frameworks is that I've been in slightly more teams/seen more ads than there even are widely-used UI frameworks; and despite all the big promises in the job adverts, 95% of the work has been to take someone else's existing UI design and connect it to someone else's existing API.
LLMs fit right in.
(Unlike me: I'm burned out by iOS and LLMs came at exactly the right time).
The point is that "Vibing" still does not produce worthy output.
Growth rate alone forced the mean output to remain at beginner level. And then let's not forget that over the last decade+, the industry saw it fit to restrict almost all coding to juniors, and turned senior+ roles into a faux-management career track.