Hacker News Reader

I'm not sure the quoted statement is true. Proofreading like "point to problems in the text", if you fix the problems yourself and don't copy-paste the solutions given to you, should still be safe, shouldn't it? So, human-written text should not be falsely flagged if you use LLM for proofreading.

And if you copy-paste the answers from LLM, I think it's only fair the end result gets flagged. You're not writing it yourself.

View on HN

> And if you copy-paste the answers from LLF, I think it's only fair the end result gets flagged. You're not writing it yourself.

I wonder if it would even get flagged in that case, because wouldn't the probability distribution of a token when the LLM is suggesting an edit to your writing be different than the distribution of that token once it is in the context of the text it's editing?

I don't even ask LLMs to go that far. Tell me if I've made a spelling, punctuation, or grammatical error, period. Don't rewrite a thing, because LLMs suck at that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com