Hacker News Reader

Comment by al_borland | Hacker News Reader

Having a CAC done is fairly cheap, ~$100 in the US. Insurance typically doesn’t cover it, but if anyone is concerned, it’s worth calling to set one up.

My dad’s doctor said he should get one, Medicare denied it, but he paid out of pocket to get one anyway. He found out he was 95% blocked pretty much everywhere and had a quadruple bypass. It likely added many years to his life and avoided a heart attack.

If you’re under a certain age (I want to say somewhere in your 50s), there isn’t any guidance for what normal is. If you’re in your 20s or 30s, I wouldn’t run out and get one. But if you’re in your 40s with a family history, or up into your 50s and beyond, it’s worth thinking about. I’ve also heard you’re only supposed to get them every 2-3 years, it’s not a yearly thing, due to the radiation.

(I am not a doctor)

View on HN

There is a heart surgeon on YouTube / TikTok that has a couple of videos on this topic.

He says, without symptoms, never get a stent. Never get a bypass unless you have chest pains, shortness of breath, or other symptoms.

Lot of people have plugged up heart arteries. If it does not impact them, don't mess with them.

My story: 61 years old. excessive fatigue. echo cardiogram, no-exercise showed no issues. CT scan looked like a christmas tree. Heart Catheterization was unable to get into the vessels for stenting. Triple CABG a few days later.

The CT scan was easy, cheap (my insurance covered it), and fast. And it put me on path to get my heart fixed.

>echo cardiogram

The main advantage of ECG compared to echo is that it's represent the functionality of the heart and overall CVD rather than structure like echo.

CT scan is not for screening and risk prediction, it's normally recommended after discovery of CVD related symptoms.

Having said that even CT cannot detect some of CVDs since it mainly cover the vascular part of the CVD not cardio engine (heart).

ECG is the only one technique that cover comprehensive CVDs screening and it's non-invasive.

It was just added to the recommended screenings list and my doctor expects that insurance will cover it soon because of that. Still at under $100, it was well worth knowing that i don't need aggressive treatment. (Though a quadruple bypass beats a heart attack)

Then again, CAC measures end-stage calcified plaque, not the soft plaque it started as, equally clogged arteries but also able to break off to cause strokes until the body calcified it.

The time to take action is long before you have a CAC score. e.g. Start tracking ApoB regularly, see if you have genetic LPa exposure, and avoid the foods that increase your exposure while ignoring the grifters telling you it's a nonissue.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com