Fact checking of some assumption of existence.
* «MPEG 3»: Yeah, sure.
* «We can print working guns right now»: No, you cannot, neither you will be able in the foreseeable. Please prove otherwise.
* «MPEG 3»: Yeah, sure.
* «We can print working guns right now»: No, you cannot, neither you will be able in the foreseeable. Please prove otherwise.
http://www.lasc.us/SAAMIMaxPressure.htm
http://www.matbase.com/material/polymers/commodity/abs-gener...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cylinder_stresses
That's a start, anyways.
1. Print plastic shaped like gun 2. Load bullet. 3. Fire bullet with now destroyed gun.
1. Model gun 2. Print wax cast 3. Make cast 4. Melt and pour steel into cast.
1. Buy everything except a upper receiver without a gun permit. 2. 3D print an upper receiver and attach to normal gun parts. 3. Use like normal gun (for a little bit)
One of the major arguments in the article is that instructions exist for printing an Assault Rifle (AR). I doubt that the rounds fired have the same lethal capacity of a "real" firearm; however, I certainly wouldn't want to be hit by the weapon in the video.