Hacker News Reader

Likely has to do with how the ancient PACER system works with the formatting being stripped and thus the content revealed and mega obvious.

It's right there in the article. A clerk wondered why there was so much white space. They don't use LLMs at that court.

They don't?

> these attacks do not seem to be succeeding, even when a judge isn’t reviewing documents with his own eyes. Brazil’s AI system caught the hidden text before it was processed, Spader noted. And in Elliott’s case, prompts were “exposed, in each of those settings, the moment a human being actually looked at what the machine produced,” Spader said.

No, they don't. That was the author of the article using something the judge said in reference to AI court systems elsewhere and applying it to a case where it did not apply because no AI was in use.

There's a long post near the top of this comment section calling the article "garbage" because of this mistake.

That's their claim without any proof.

It's a court of law after all, not Anthropic/OpenAI. A bit more credible.

The proof is the judge said he doesn't run his courtroom that way.

Maybe their AI caught it...?