That said if companies want to "ship ship ship fast", then yes even AI can produce bugs or regressions if not carefully reviewed by the human.
These days we're generating multiple times more code than we were writing before. That means a similar multiple of opportunities for bugs to be introduced - so the ability to automate security review is more impactful in proportion to that.
You should question your ability to see any bugs on YOUR side.
How do you know? You might be adding (latent) bugs every time your LLM fixes one for you.
That covers functionality - it doesn't catch the kind of bugs talked about in TFA.
If the first derivative is positive, adding people does not help.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/2_%2B_1/4_%2B_1/8_%2B_1/16_%...
Speak for your workplace only.
Most places still consider a PR or commit yours, if your name is attached.
Act accordingly.
I've been looking for a new job where people aren't so reckless... the AI psychosis is heavy at my current job.
Author claims something slightly different but that’s how I would look at it.
The extremes are more potent because either you get super secure 10 times vetted system or you get underpowered model slop with all the vulnerabilities it entails.