Hacker News Reader

Comment by TD-Linux | Hacker News Reader

There is no "IPv8". Any crackpot can submit an internet-draft to the IETF, and this person happened to call theirs IPv8. If the submitter actually read the draft rather than feeding it to the slop cannon, they would have realized it is also a LLM hallucination that someone uploaded to IETF.

View on HN

I am fairly sure the authors do understand this (see: "Most network engineers would laugh this off as an April Fools RFC written by an enterprise architect on buzzword overdrive."). But since the proposal got a lot of attention, responding to it is a public service. And delegating this to an LLM arguably provides an accurate signal as to how much human attention the original proposal deserved :-P

This. While I'm generally opposed to using LLMs to make changes in critical parts of systems, a vibed spec just naturally prompts a vibed implementation.

OpenPGP key servers are an internet draft, if memory serves. I guess they don't exist either.

In fairness, they exist by virtue of having working implementations that (at least a few) people actually use, not by virtue of being an Internet-Draft.

It is not an individual I-D, but has been adopted by a working group, and has a chance of actually being published as a RFC.

they are disgustingly slow so maybe we need a new draft...

SCEP was (and still is) a very deployed protocol yet took 20 years for the draft to be published...

Worse, there is an IPv8, from 1994, the obsolete P internet protocol (PIP) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IP_version_numbers

There was also a second prior "IPv8" proposal from a couple years later by notorious mailing list troll Jim Fleming, which he subsequently expanded to "IPv16"

The entire point of the experiment was to take this specific, absurd Internet-Draft (which indeed exists as an active submission) and see what happens if someone actually implements it to the letter instead of just hand-waving it away.

LLMs might be able to hallucinate RFC text, but they certainly can't compile a patched Linux 6.6 kernel with a working AF_INET8 socket family, patch musl/iproute2/frr, spawn a 10-node QEMU mesh, and route 112,000 active FIB entries under live traffic.

The source code and commit history are right there in the GitLab repos - feel free to pull the kernel tree and run the test suite yourself.

Can't they? I thought this kind of thing was within Fable's capabilities.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com