There's a lot of archaeological evidence that art + toys were made before tools by a good amount of time IIRC. It makes sense to me as humans were always social creative creatures and the ideas that we didn't want to express ourselves 300,000 years ago seems kinda silly.
is this a broken AI bot?
Looks like, though a shame if true, since the account is more than 10 years old and presumably had a person behind it at some point.
What suggests that it is?
"_Tools_ have a response to this post" is not a sensible comment that a human would likely make. It reads like a prompt to an AI accidentally pasted into the wrong place.
It is terse but the comment is sensible to me.
OK, what does "_Tools_ have a response to this post" mean to you, in the context of the posted article, and as a response to it? Why would a human being organically reply to the article with that sentence?
tools as an artifact can be contraposed to art as artifact? the juxtaposition hints to a challenge of the article's claims about the dualities of art?
You've lost the plot old chap. Time to go outside and smell the fresh air, get some exercise, talk to a human person.