This is what happens when you give nearly complete immunity to a politician (de facto complete due to his age and the 2/3 requirement for the senate to convict).
In a way, it seems somewhat signaling that the precedent was long set, and unspoken rules always effectively 'allowed' it, so here I am, just being more candid about it than stale O..ld Windows have previously encouraged.
Others engaged in similar practices do get named. They don't need to be named here.
Though tossing a drive-by MAGA at me was the bigger clue for the age group. The hubris part left me confused, but I suspect you are the type that considers self-definition threatening. You should consider getting accustomed to people not getting in your pre-fab'd boxes on demand. Of course, if your mob is large enough, you can bend the general rule and use force.
Edit: Mucho extra credit if you can cite a single instance of ever being concerned about corruption, especially insider trading before orange man.