Of course, this is economically efficient. Nobody is going to give up Amazon same-day-delivery so that some local small business owner's kids can live better than the median person.
Of course, this is economically efficient. Nobody is going to give up Amazon same-day-delivery so that some local small business owner's kids can live better than the median person.
If the bad scenario happens and 99% of the people becomes irrelevant to the economy, everybody will live their life's worried about basic necessities and smart hardworking people will be richer because your background or where you live or grew up doesn't matter.
Life is not fair. We should accept that AI companies and billionaires deserve to be aristocrats. They worked hard to create these conditions. In the end, it will trickle-down (this one I partly agree, irony aside)
I don't believe this at all. Social mobility definitely existed. It was at least possible to educate oneself and rise in society. Maybe the effort required wasn't equal for everybody, but it sure as hell wasn't impossible, because I've personally seen it happen.
That is fundamentally different from this supposedly K shaped economy world where it is literally impossible to rise. Education and talent don't matter anymore. It looks like the possible futures are either a post scarcity society or a cyberpunk dystopia.
If you believe that, nothing will change much. It will still be possible, just the effort and luck required will be way bigger for the middle class to become rich. That's sad, but life is not fair and we are not entitled to social mobility the same way we are not entitled to housing, food and leisure.
If the cyberpunk dystopia happens, the trillionaires will live in the moon or Mars, and we will live here, maybe with shittier lifes, but that's on us. If we want to avoid that, we just need to become billionaires as well. Sadly, I'm too lazy for that, so I accept that it will never happen to me. I accepted that I will be "permanent underclass", because I don't see a reason for post scarcity to happen.
I always heard it as "petty" bourgeoisie and was a bit confused. Now I get it.
> The petite bourgeoise sink[s] gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on, and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists, partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production.