Have these stages been observed, or are they merely a speculative story? No one has ever demonstrated life arising from non-life (a violation of the Law of Biogenesis).
What is semantically incoherent about my perspective that life was clearly designed?
> a violation of the Law of Biogenesis
An obviously circular argument, as any intellectually honest person with any sense acting in good faith can see. That life generally comes from life rather than, say, maggots spontaneously generating from meat as was once believed does not mean that abiogenesis isn't possible -- this is a grossly dishonest argument crafted by those despicable worms at "Answers in Genesis". And by basic logic if there were a "law" that abiogenesis violates then theogenesis would violate it too. Adam and Eve weren't born so they violate this supposed law. This is obvious and only the most profoundly stupid and dishonest people could deny it. The fact is that there is no such "law" and people who idiotically base arguments on it don't understand what empirical (as opposed to those imposed by governments) laws are.
As my LLM put it, "The entire apologetics argument relies on a massive equivocation fallacy and historical semantic games".
I despise willfully ignorant intellectually dishonest godbot science denying trash so I won't see any further comments from you (muted with my frontend to HN) and you won't hear further from me.