> No, AI assistance is NOT welcome in general.
Can you cite that? I see them specifically welcoming AI security reports; I don't see any evidence that other AI submissions are not welcome.
Can you cite that? I see them specifically welcoming AI security reports; I don't see any evidence that other AI submissions are not welcome.
For example, I found this on a Google search, here is a thread from Theo, the project leader, about LLM output and copyright, where he says they can't accept it into the tree on copyright grounds. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=177425035627562&w=2
Elsewhere in the thread he implies using it for a code review tool is ok
I also just read more context on the thread and it seems like Damien Miller is in there saying much the same thing as Theo. He wrote:
> ... use of AI-written code now [will] expose us to legal risk.
I think AI generated bugfixes and smaller features that don't duplicate fairly unique pieces of work in other projects are much less problematic from a copyright perspective at least.