> I would not describe it as Kagi being indirectly Russian.
What do you mean? That Kagi is directly Russian?
Paying a russian provider isn't against the law and at some point we need to bring Russia back into the warmth of the West.
What do you mean? That Kagi is directly Russian?
Paying a russian provider isn't against the law and at some point we need to bring Russia back into the warmth of the West.
no, that Kagi is buying from Russian supplies
> Paying a russian provider isn't against the law and
I never claimed that it is
> at some point we need to bring Russia back into the warmth of the West.
no we don't, and hopefully Russia will be forced to behave before we do this
I do maintain some boycotts that significantly inconvenience me (Amazon being one; I won’t enumerate them all), so I’m not just making excuses for inaction.
So I am fine with singling out Russia.