I’d personally steer clear of messaging platforms for this - who knows what one might stumble into there
I’d personally steer clear of messaging platforms for this - who knows what one might stumble into there
Personally I have no interest, but sometime browse stuff out of curiosity. But this got more of my curiosity, what kind of "stuff" are you implying they might stumble upon on the open, public internet? Sure, some NSFW, horror and otherwise weird stuff is there, especially around AI generation, but hardly something that will leave you traumatized, unless I misunderstand what you're implying?
And no, including the word "girl" in H3 does not lead to CSAM in any way, shape or form, but it's a great example how FUD quickly spreads.
One thing that I had experience with, that led me to believe this might be true: it seems one of the earlier llama models was over-tuned to resist generating CSAM. Once I tried a somewhat sensitive prompt containing the word "girl" in it. Llama only ever generated refusals for this prompt, citing I was prompting for CSAM. GPTs and Claudes of that era had no issues with the same prompt.
But I haven't seen anything reliable about H3 being particularly special in ther regard.
even a Chinese model that thinks its Claude when asked would have inherited this association