People with dyslexia and dystrophia, commonly use LLMs to proofread content. Even Anthropic admits this is a limitation.
I am cancelling my Claude max 5x subscription and moving to ChatGPT pro. I have difficulty enough trying to ensure my meaning comes through correctly, along with everything else; to now have to look out for/analyse watermarks too?
I feel shamed enough by society, thanks Anthropic.
Both points suggest your subscription support was well chosen before.
Unless with "proofreading" you actually mean having the LLM write your content for you.
AI stigmatization is ableism.
What I was trying to point to was that "this thing helps some people" does not equal "this thing is unequivocally Good and should be entirely unchecked".
I don't even care about the AI. I just get peeved by bad lines of argumentation.
You quoted a Futurama caricature that is not comparable to all this, apparently because the words "assistive technology" were used.
In the literal sense that a gun is not a chatbot? True.
In the sense that both your post and my analogy use the argument "this is assistive technology" to defend something which only in a very narrow slice of their thing-ness actually is assistive and in the whole rest of usages are much more, and not only Good, which both you and my "futurama caricature" were willfully ignoring? I think it's quite illustrative.