Which is pretty unfortunate for those that want to learn. I used to enjoy writing documentation at work, it was my favorite part of the job. And it did feel like it benefited me more than it benefited all the people that were (or weren't) reading my documentation. Now I can't really justify spending much time on docmentation when LLM's can do it in a fraction of the time and it's "good enough"
Is it perfect? No. But it suffices most of the time in a pinch.
Can’t speak to the nuke industry, but it’s pretty good at aviation related things.
Then elaborate in small chunks so the human domain expert can remain focused during review.
You tell it what you need, and it pretty much does all the work: > please give me a 135 compliant maintenance manual, use the attached document as a primer, reference every part 135, 91, 43, and 65 reg as appropriate as well as the other included manuals. Make sure to reference every requirement in the attached list of requirements. Aircraft mx manuals are in the folder “mx-manuals” and our current forms are pdfs in the “forms” folder. Remember our operation is <describe scope of operation here>, not a major airline. Have fun!
This does surprisingly well and meets requirements at about 95% or better accuracy. Typically the only problem I routinely is trying to make the manual like a Delta Air Lines manual instead of one for a small air taxi.