OpenAI is clearly run by dummies and subpar engineering talent.
> The model is obviously impressive
Speak for yourself.
It’s just another example of a company demonstrating shamelessness in the pursuit of growth, in an industry where consequences do not exist.
Let's agree to disagree. Remember flicker-gate? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403908
"They wouldn't be that dumb" is a meaningless argument. People you don't know can be as smart as anyone on the planet and still make very dumb choices.
It's just really weird. Why does everyone feel the need to equivocate? "I worry about genocide and the environmental impact of radiation from nuclear bombs. Obviously, they are very useful for annihilating entire cities, certainly. But are we really atrophying our ability to invade with infantry?"
I want to tell these people to just cut it out. It's demeaning to their own position.
No idea where you stand politically but there's not that many arguments about this type of rhetorical error so hopefully you consider it.