Hacker News Reader

while looking at the wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movile_Cave), this popped up from 2015 from bbc earth: https://web.archive.org/web/20210531110415/https://www.bbc.c...

Pangram isn't useful for single documents. Too many false positives. It only gives something approaching actionable results if you use it on an entire corpus.

An updated Turing Test is overdue or has someone suggested one?

Pangram isn’t a reliable detector

Still the linked article reads like slop

Doesn’t mean it is.

I bet you can find pre-AI articles that sound like slop too.

I keep requesting this here, but so far I haven't been given any links.

There's probably a good reason for that.