Because the economic, social, and climate impacts are at best uncertain and at worst devastating to the majority of human beings on the planet. It's always surprising to me that people don't intuitively separate the usefulness of AI from its risks. It feels like everyone has to be a doomer or a booster.
> at worst devastating
This is such a low bar literally anything would clear it. Even tomato farming.
I think you're going to have to flesh this out a little more, friend. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
You know that the reason the semantic web didn't work out is that it only benefits a small number of participants (aggregators), right?