> dangerous to wildlife
Is this claim substantive at all?
Is this claim substantive at all?
If a flock of flamingos or geese are doing a low pass it's possible they get shredded by them.
If Godzilla tries to get out of the water near them it's possible it gets hit in the head. Also he may destroy them since Godzilla is, as we all know, a nuclear energy proponent.
There is of course some danger to wildlife but compared to things like planes, cars and boats its pretty minimal and can be managed.