Meanwhile real Jevons is a very particular effect that doesn't show up on all road graphs and doesn't simply mean that opening up more lanes will attract more traffic.
Meanwhile real Jevons is a very particular effect that doesn't show up on all road graphs and doesn't simply mean that opening up more lanes will attract more traffic.
People scoff at road construction (or rather, road widening) as a solution to congestion. I don't think anyone is under the impression that kilometers driven would go down as road bandwidth goes up.
>The road capacity led to more cars on the road, but also to more real demand being met.
No, not necessarily. Maybe some people who would have otherwise used public transport opt to drive instead. Making roads wider could literally make them less efficient, in terms of humans moved per hour per meter of width.
It is a solution to congestion because a part of the past congestion was that people were stuck at home and gave up on the trip overall, because it would take so long.
> Maybe some people who would have otherwise used public transport opt to drive instead.
Then presumably comfort increased. Also, add bus lanes.
That's not congestion. If someone opts not to make a trip, or uses a means of transport that doesn't use the road, such as a subway, then they didn't create road traffic. Congestion refers specifically to the failure of traffic to advance at an efficient speed along a thoroughfare.
>Then presumably comfort increased.
Again, "people scoff at road construction as a solution to congestion". Discomfort is not a component of congestion.
As the cost of attention goes down, and the cost of communicating bad ideas goes down, capturing attention with bad ideas paradoxically goes up.