Kalshi and Polymarket bets on clinical trials criticized as 'ghastly'
text.npr.org
text.npr.org
This is why principled ethical behavior MUST be a cornerstone of acceptable behavior above greed. Even if you are washing and selling greed as “financial obligations” “capital interests” or some other corporate bullshit.
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/23/nx-s1-5797876/polymarket-pari...
The incentive was already there without prediction markets, just like the incentive to screw with drug trials has been around as long as biotech companies that are publicly traded have been making drugs. Wherever there is a measurement tied to a monetary payout, unscrupulous people will try to manipulate it.
This doesn’t change anything since the incentive already existed before prediction markets, people are getting unreasonably emotional about prediction markets due to headline overload.
Creating a new incentive where one does not exist can create moral hazards, an easy example is introducing wildfire prediction markets.
The incentive to interfere in drug trials has been around as long as biotech companies have been publicly traded, this changes nothing.
Introducing wildfire prediction markets is an example of something that does not exist and would be reckless and stupid. The stock market already bets on drug trial outcomes.
Not to excuse these guys for all their other awfulness of course.
As with most terrible behaviors when a few people do it the results to society aren't so bad. When it gains potential for mass application of the same behavior it becomes a crisis.
Wildfire prediction markets would be incredibly reckless and dangerous.
The two situations are not even close to being the same.
But yes, there is portion of "investing" that is actually gambling. That is what Enron did and it threw down the economy. Those gamblers usually loose and we have quite a lot of regulations trying to restrict the impact of that gambling.
And yes, the usual suspect hate those regulations.