But your view of art is based on who you “think” made it. So if someone lies about who made the art your views on the art changed. That’s a strange position that doesn’t make sense to me.
Always thought that was interesting, because if the lies weren't exposed the readers would have remained inspired.
Also, if someone lies about using genAI I discover it, that makes the "artist" a liar who cannot be trusted.
At the same time, blatant copying was excepted, painters today can take Rembrandts like you wouldn't know the difference. But art fruits in a time and place.
I still think LLMs won't generate art worth anything, of course I make genai pictures of my dog with a pet bird.