Because things like this, I am using sandboxes, doing automated and manual review before running any code. As it takes time, I now need to try to one shot the development of the code which takes longer to do a proper specification.

And even with much care on all the steps, when I read carefully, I still find wrong things at multiple levels.

When folks like uncle Bob says they don't review AI code, I can only think they are burnt out or being unprofessional.

Indeed it saves some time writing the code, but overall, I think we just moved concerns from one place to another. When writing your code, you are automatically reviewing things and integrating with other pieces. Ofc, sometimes mistakes happen, but my impression is that important code still takes about the same to develop.

There are ways to go further and still try to LLM'it all the way, but since claude 4.8 the types of mistakes have been much more convoluted. Fable and opus 5 leaves too many gaps and take so many poor decisions.

GLM has a nice balance. It stops me only when important things come up and it integrates well with my way of working.

With Anthropic is a lot of do a lot, clean up and fix fix fix. With glm has been more like working together and delivering...

Anthropic models have gone wrong.