> There's a quote I forgot that says: "There is a Quality to Quantity".
> I agree with that, it may not be reliable, full featured, well designed, ergonomic, etc. But quantity enables things and thus is a quality in itself. It allows use-cases that benefit from accessible cheap software.
The underlying assumption here is that the quantity delivered is acceptable and does not worsen the customer experience. To continue with the manufacturing domain example; if a company produced widgets quickest and for minimal cost, yet had more lawsuits stemming from their use, is that the kind of enabling an organization should pursue?
> Those use-cases were not viable prior, because cost/time was prohibitive.
Sometimes a cigar is a cigar and sometimes what is thought to be a desirable use-case is prohibitive because, once sufficiently vetted, it is neither cost nor time which disqualifies it.