Sorry, can you point out the section of that document that justifies the “found to be more hazardous” claim?
> As of July 23, 2026, we have temporarily removed our safety analysis from this report, as well as relevant references to the analysis throughout the report (denoted in-text by a reference to this section). We were made aware of data discrepancies between City agency data for New York City for-hire vehicle crashes with serious injuries or deaths, as well as City agency data definitions related to such crashes. We are working to resolve these discrepancies and ensure our findings properly represent the data and the driving records of New York City for-hire vehicle drivers and Waymo vehicles. Other than this section, the remainder of our report remains unchanged.
My guess is jdlyga read this report before it was modified.
You can have strong anti- "car-culture" views and still be committed to the truth.
Would they have published that result with the same fanfare?
this reddit thread has excerpts from the report and some comments explaining why the comparison was fraught
https://www.reddit.com/r/fuckcars/comments/1v1qiz0/waymo_has...