I see what this is going for but can’t help but feel like it’s overwrought. It feels a bit like the most likely outcomes are increased token burn, review surface, and time per task vs not using this.
Who knows, maybe that’s a good thing.
Who knows, maybe that’s a good thing.
It seems that many of these projects are not benchmarked, so it's difficult to know whether there is an improvement in any circumstance, and what the cost is. Of course, a benchmark will be fuzzy, because codebases are all different, but it'd be a start.
Many of these skills, rules, "playbooks", and such are kitchensink attempts at steering the model. It augments the model to frame it's reasoning according to project rules and flows, but cannot be really trusted to adhere to it. More of a vibe guideline.