Hacker News Reader

It’s a marketing. They are a sham company. If this article was by Scientific American or something it would be worth a lot more. They are literally trying to keep the hype train on track.

Also on HN front page today: AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T (fortune.com)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160699

View on HN

It is marketing, they are a shady company, and yet, if someone had access to these results before today's modern AI tools, they could get tenure at any university in the world.

As others have said, it's hard to know how significant these results are without more transparency around the methods used to obtain them.

Not really. Why would that be the case?

If the prompt was crafted by an expert mathematician with pages of context and insights provided to the LLM to put it on the right path, that is a lot less impressive than a prompt that just says "find a counterexample to this conjecture".

Similarly, if they are spending millions of dollars in inference just churning on thousands of problems and these are the 10 solutions they came up with, that would be less impressive than if they chose these 10 problems specifically and were able to come up with solutions.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com