it's not about having 98% confidence. but 100% irrefutable proof.
You can go to reddit and cherry pick coments, that are made before LLMs, that have that exact LLM style.
You can go to reddit and cherry pick coments, that are made before LLMs, that have that exact LLM style.
Any assingement of blame of using unauthorized LLM generated content could be shifted to external contractor(preferably outside of EU's jurisdiction) where you yourself had no awareness of it. Contract of course explicitly forbids LLM content and requires labeling.
This is and extremely basic loophole that gives enough plausible deniability to any sane publisher/content farm.
Now you need to prove they were aware of LLM content being generated, as they cannot rely on LLM content detection methods due to high amount of false positives.
Even easier if you publish content from people writing under pseudonyms/anonymously. It devolves into he said she said kind of situation, and burden of proof is on accusers side.
Basically depending on enforcement this system either:
- only punishes small players that cannot afford to setup such chain
- is used as an arbitrary excuse to shut some outlets if the system is corrupt