>to a measly "you can't train a useful robotics LLM because there's not enough data"..
This was the claim from the very beginning. You should have asked why I think what I think, instead of leading with "the entire premise is wrong!"...
This was the claim from the very beginning. You should have asked why I think what I think, instead of leading with "the entire premise is wrong!"...
Your entire premise was wrong at every point, and now you're trying to wriggle your way out of admitting it.
Prove it!