Or do you think, maybe, that there's a deeper issue here and the problem isn't exclusive to just these anti-EU politicians you want to scapegoat?
In order to get legislation you want (say: gay rights) you have to risk legislation you don’t like, for some, that would be gay rights too…
And things that you think are bad, are bad.
Everyone feels this way about their things.
There are plenty of subjective areas where people can disagree without being fundamentally bad people. These things are not those.
What's your position on military spending? Because if we don't spend then our countries get invaded (see: Ukraine) but if we do spend then we're taking money from starving families.. hrm..
I personally have a really hard time, since unfortunately I can empathise with the motivations of others, and everyone has a point, even if I don't agree with it.
The thing is, that I'm aware that everyone thinks they're the good guy, the hero, or the "necessary evil for the greater good", and I find it more interesting to understand why they think what they think is better than what I think.
The alternative means I've already factored the entire populations needs and circumstances, which, for my tiny meat brain which can only empathise with one person at a time is practically impossible.
How did you manage it?
Or, abortion is bad.
Or, apostasy is bad.
Or, drawing a depiction of Muhammed is bad.
They don't consider them opinions, they consider them facts.
I'm sure a couple of people who are supporting this government ID initiative genuinely believe that it's the only solution to an actual problem: because they don't have the technical acumen to figure out a solution that preserves privacy, ensures freedom of dependency from a single nations duopoly and actually solves their issue.