- “paid for by tax payers who fund the court systems”. The alternative would mean taking away the right of private citizens to sue.
- “paid for by tax payers who fund the court systems”. The alternative would mean taking away the right of private citizens to sue.
The alternative would not be to take away the right of private citizens to sue. There is, surprisingly enough, quite a chasm between identifying that some parties are taking advantage of a system and completely shutting that system down.
> "There is, surprisingly enough, quite a chasm between identifying that some parties are taking advantage of a system and completely shutting that system down."
I stated that there is a large range of possibilities between the existing system and taking away a right to sue.
You then repeated your earlier statement, in a slightly different form, so I just repeated mine.
You keep going on about "individuals" when I'm clearly talking about trial lawyers looking to get rich, while we get $5 off our next meal at Taco Bell.