GitHub constantly feels like features get requested with a one-sentence description, and then people who have never used any other major code review systems go build it without any further assistance or feedback, and eventually it just escapes containment and nobody tells the authors that there's a gigantic pile of bug feedback threads until almost a year later. Ten things get fixed, then another feature breaks out and focus shifts.

Allowing two different workflows – even within the same project – just shows the lack of strategy for how this should work.

Re-educating when and when not force-push is a holy sin is also a barrier to alignment.