At face value a policy that essentially prohibits AI generated implementation seems entirely unreasonable to me.
LLMs fundamentally hinder all three. I'm not sure you even need to look much further than that.
> In the kernel community we do open source because it results in better technology, not because of religious reasons.
> And so we make decisions primarily based on technical merit. Not fear of new tools.
You are not making an argument based on technical merit here.
It would be interesting to know why they decided for a general prohibition, rather than going with the default "a human must be responsible for the contribution" kind of policy.
Perhaps they have received a flood of undesirable AI generated contributions, and actual contributors do not use AI significantly.