Stripping voting rights is a historical leading indicator of a trend to totalitarianism so it has to be nipped in the bud immediately.
Stripping voting rights is a historical leading indicator of a trend to totalitarianism so it has to be nipped in the bud immediately.
In my opinion the real trend towards totalitarianism is inability to talk freely about ideas
It's easy and popular to talk about how important democracy or voting rights are. And that makes it a bit annoying because it deprives the possibility of freely exploring other ideas. There's no possibility of free speech or free exchange of ideas so long as portion of the population thinks we have to immediately nip dangerous ideas in the bud without exploration.
That's the point.
> There's no possibility of free speech or free exchange of ideas so long as portion of the population thinks we have to immediately nip dangerous ideas in the bud without exploration.
The "nipping dangerous ideas in the bud" language relates to those ideas being implemented, not being discussed.
Find us a person who honestly believes there a class of citizens (other than convicted felons, minors, and mentally incompetent) shouldn't have a right to vote who doesn't want to use it for political gains.
Easy the philosophers Plato and Socrates who believed that only philosophers and those who sought wisdom should have a say in the affairs of the sate. I mean philosophy is full of ideas of how nations should be organized and it's interesting because there's no dogma around it and no villainizing disagreements
>e "nipping dangerous ideas in the bud" language relates to those ideas being implemented, not being discussed.
Great because last I checked Tobais Lutke was discussing the idea not implementing it
Plato and Socrates obviously weren’t democrats. Also, neither of them is still alive.
> philosophy is full of ideas of how nations should be organized and it's interesting because there's no dogma around it and no villainizing disagreements
That’s because philosophy is abstract. Nobody of any importance is seriously claiming that we should have philosopher-kings leading Western societies. It’s too distant a threat.
> last I checked Tobais Lutke was discussing the idea not implementing it
Lutke was only discussing the idea, but that doesn’t mean it should be paid any heed. It’s also completely fair game to publicly shame him for such ideas.