As a software engineer the legal system scares me. How can we put someone in jail (for the rest of their lives in some cases) based on nebulous rules and personal interpretation/application of the law?
Unfortunately this isn't unusual, well except it actually being accepted that he was innocent after the fact.
We steal people's life work, destroy livelihoods, etc, etc, on far, far far flimsier grounds.
Just because many things can do something doesn't negate a discussion about one of the things. Your point (which it barely is one) isn't really interesting or useful.
Most people harm themselves more by considering it anything more than a fixed system to be calculated against, bashing their head into a wall for no gain.
* To the typical HN user
Perhaps I am atypical for HN, but I see a clear distinction between corrupted legal systems or layers in society (most lawyers in general), and force majeure* from natural disasters: the average person isn't paying taxes to make sure natural disaster continues happening, and history has shown that system collapse is often preceded by intolerable taxation used in offensive ways. Average persons holding pitchforks...
Keep in mind that Klayme wasn't the only victim of this shoddy prosecutor: while he had to navigate the prison bitch brothels, the real perpetrator might continue the abuse with same and possibly many other victims!
Can we please discuss how misattributions like this can be prevented, and think of ways to align the interests of all parties?