But the lawyer would say "okay, help me prove you didn't send these messages"
We know he's innocent, and he knows he's innocent, but how does he prove it?
We know he's innocent, and he knows he's innocent, but how does he prove it?
Also a competent lawyer would have done a scrupulous audit of the chain of reasoning that led to his client, which would have revealed the username mixup.
Seriously? It's not an assumption.