Hacker News Reader

Comment by Art9681 | Hacker News Reader

The absolute best way to prove this works is by releasing a model that was fine-tuned with this method and then showing benchmarks depicting the improvement delta between the base model and the fine tuned one.

The work is not done. Then release it to the masses and wait a few days for the actual real world anecdotes.

Until then, this is noise.

View on HN

Valid criticism. Happy to answer any qs. We're still working on solidfying results.

Ok, I think it is in your interest to wait until you have more to show, and we'll be happy to help you with reposting it once it's ready.

Waitlists are against the Show HN rules (https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html), and you're likely to get a lot of community pushback if you post before there's enough substance for users to sink their teeth into.

Edit: we eventually got a more substantive writeup from OP so I moved that text to the top and re-upped this thread.

Thanks for the heads up, removed mention!

Benchmarks are the ultimate consolidation of halnons razor.

[flagged]

"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Yeah, this is just slop. No benchmarks, no concrete case studies, just some vibecoded "platform" to finetune models on your own traces.

Which is an idea that has some value, but also some weaknesses. And this implementation of it isn't forthcoming with that concept. You have to really dig in to understand what they're even talking about.

Happy to answer any qs.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com