Not the only one though: I remember what happened when we 'invaded' Lybia: not one criticism in the French news anywhere, total censorship, even though our media had widely and correctly criticised the US for the Irak war..
So I think the best thing is to get news from everywhere Russia, China, the US, Europe, but that's a lot of work..
It is also not possible as there is censorship in some cases. The European Union has blocked rt.com.
That is blocked because far too many EU residents were taking it as 100% fact and acting upon it.
The block is only DNS level, IIRC, and doesn't affect VPNs.
once you require VPNs this means 90% of people wont see it
you cant get news from Russia they prevent you from seeing it
As compared to what more trustworthy, honest news sources? Please name a few, I'm curious.
Usually the argument is that because a reputable news agency with a history of high quality journalism made once a mistake, it's better to listen to some angry podcaster with a history inviting cooky nutcase, or sketchy Twitter account with history of boosting fake news as jokes.
no the pattern is constantly having the same blindspot. like newscaster pushing for "safe and effective" bs completely ignoring side effects
Two things can be true at the same time. The lack of good sources and the fact that france24 is pure propaganda.