As I mentioned explicitly in the comment you're replying to: yes, I did read that section. Did you not bother to read my whole comment before telling me to read more?
This part of your comment is confusing.
The article talks about agents past this period. Yet it seems like you’re saying this article isn’t relevant because it doesn’t?
> just writes off any improvement
Is not what that section contains?
There's a more nuanced point about capabilities improving in some ways but not others (ability to one-shot apps vs. maintenance of existing code over time).