What would "actual" evidence look like? I have a hard time believing that if they released the logs that people would take it more seriously. The temptation would be to say "they fabricated those for marketing". Just as they supposedly fabricated this story, no?

It would require collusion with HuggingFace, including getting them to release their disclosure blogpost a week in advance. Huggingface is primarily a hub for open models, so there's not really an incentive for them to jump through hoops/lie to provide marketing for OpenAI's (closed) models. So it's highly unlikely this is fabricated.

It's hilarious that people find the idea that these 2 would collude in making this elaborate PR scheme ridiculous. As if the psychopaths like Sama and the rest of his ilk wouldn't ever dream of doing something companies have been doing since time immemorial.

OpenAI are promising more details in the future:

> We will continue to conduct a thorough investigation alongside Hugging Face and will share more details on the vulnerabilities, incident, and findings when our investigation is complete.

If they break that promise we can justifiably yell at them about it.