I find it endearing that someone is keeping up the resistance against JavaScript. Used things like noscript myself since 2008 or so. Eventually gave up since nearly no website would work that way and served you captcha loops instead.
As the web gets more hostile (2018 was so much worse than 2008) NoScript will be more competitive in spite of all the inconvenience.
(Asking because they've both become routine problems for me with most browsers, probably since I disable cookies + run an ad blocker).
I still haven't allowed Cloudflare, though. That is bounce or incognito.
Archive.is blocks agents, I think, but you get the idea.
Also, I really wonder what the economics are for your example. The JS boilerplate for the anubis landing page is usually longer than the piece of information I need.
(That's ignoring the actual anubis JS, which is probably on a privacy-destroying shared CDN link).
The amount of work you have to put in to support a complete absence of JavaScript is more than 2x the original time spent on getting the site to work and it will lead to a heavily degraded user experience that nobody wants in the first place.
The amount of features locked behind JavaScript keep increasing. There are so many essential features that require JavaScript it is completely unreasonable to argue against them.