See you proved my point. You know the tools the FBI uses. I'm sure their in bed with Palantir too.
Police state against my enemies but not me and the good guys. It's all so tiresome.
Police state against my enemies but not me and the good guys. It's all so tiresome.
I'm not the one you asked, but: Me, personally, I'd draw the line at the independence of the courts. If the courts are independent, if they can rule against the police for failure to prove their case or for procedural violations or whatever, then it's not a police state. If the police win the borderline cases (or worse, the clearly bogus cases) just because they're the police, then it's a police state.
Followup question:
Do you think public defenders are given adequate funding to ensure they can give proper defense to their clients?
Who said this?