They're easy enough to skip - click the little "-" icon and you'll collapse the entire sub-thread.
They're easy enough to skip - click the little "-" icon and you'll collapse the entire sub-thread.
It's a decent heuristic because the better models generate better pelicans. That's all. Nobody sane is going to make a bet on a model based on a pelican. But it's cool, it's tradition by now, and it's a semblance of a good first impression for new models.
But you bet my ass I check everytime to have a look at see how that pelican looks, it's just a fun check and also interesting to see the cost/results.
thank you.
I feel like the human brain massively overweights negative feedback over positive, and that's even after accounting for the fact that internet discourse tends to mostly surface negative comments (whereas the enjoyers stay silent). By default I have to try hard not to take it personally whenever someone leaves a negative comment about my work.
So just doing my bit to say I appreciate your commentary on so much of the fast-evolving AI landscape. Helps me orient :)
Consensus has an unfortunate habit of beginning that way.
And outrage at the unimpressed is.. a curious standard for a sponsored blogger.