Popular sugar substitutes linked to faster brain aging
sciencedaily.com
sciencedaily.com
Until a study is done which properly accounts for this well known correlation, I will remain incredibly skeptical that artificial sweeteners have any of these supposed negative effects.
"[...] We also investigated whether obesity, diabetes, and a healthy diet, all evaluated in 2 categories (no/yes), modified the association between LNCS consumption and cognitive decline by adding a 3-way interaction among the consumption of LNCS, the timescale, and each modifier on model 2."
In the results section: "[...] obesity and diet did not modify the association between LNCS consumption and cognitive decline [...]"
And often people tell me not to eat "suger" and carbs like "rice". I never listen to them.
People find it hard to lose weight and it's not hard to understand why.
Nothing beats a calorie deficit for weight loss.
Deficit = TDEE (total calorie burn for the day) - calorie intake
Most people go wrong when they diet. These are the reasons I see most often:
a) They try to eat too little. It works in the short term, but within several weeks, they become miserable and bounce back to binge eating, undoing all their progress.
Many people have a TDEE of 2,700 kcal and start eating an 800–1,100 kcal diet for weight loss.
Eating 800–1,500 kcal isn't wrong, but it's more suitable for someone who is an experienced dieter. Beginners, more often than not, will fail with this approach.
b) They don't know the calorie density of foods. Many believe granola is a low calorie, healthy option based purely on their gut feelings about the food and its appearance.
c) Many people are sedentary and have low muscle mass, so their TDEE is quite low. To cut weight, they need to go 400–500 kcal below it, and guess what? They end up miserable because their TDEE is already low, and lowering their intake by 400–500 kcal puts them in a zone with too little food.
The solution is Zone 2 cardio not because it burns more fat, but because it's easy on the joints, and most people can sustain it for hours, resulting in a higher cumulative calorie burn with much less stress on the recovery system.
To throw a monkey wrench into this scheme, oftentimes when you diet down, your body lowers its metabolism (through metabolic adaptation or increased efficiency in physical activities). Other times, people simply move less when they eat at a deficit because they feel low on energy, lowering their TDEE.
Remember, since deficit = TDEE - intake:
If TDEE drops too low, calorie intake must go down to maintain the deficit; otherwise, there will be no weight loss.
I've been working to solve this problem and we've lots of success with maintenance tracking approach.
I'm guessing you're talking about fruits. In which case, you consume them, but you don't digest them. The sugar in them is bound up with a ton of fiber, and the majority of it never gets digested. That's why dried fruit is so much higher in calories than its source: all the water and fiber is removed.
ETA: This press release relates to this study published Sept 3rd 2025 https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000214023 https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-09-11-toxic-artificial-swee... https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/sugar-substitutes-not-s...
Adults under 60 who consumed the most artificial sweeteners — averaging 191 milligrams daily — experienced a 62% faster decline in memory and thinking skills compared to low or non-users.
My goodness.
I almost expect a clause stating that this study was in part funded by the Brazil Sugar Export Consortium...
This is a real problem for the anti sugar low carb people tho'.
I've added dates to my diet.