Isn't literally every photograph taken with a modern iPhone technically an "AI-generated / AI-edited image"?
It's a groundbreaking idea but it might work. And who knows, maybe it's an innovation we could apply to other areas of law in case they also ever need to interact with any ambiguity (which hasn't happened yet, of course).
> some type of like... room... maybe call it a "court"... where people could "judge" whether a person fell on the allowable or disallowable end
Have you seen some of these listings? We are talking about retaining walls invented where they can’t exist, work displayed that hasn’t occurred, etc. if you show up to a property and it’s materially different than the picture that got you there, that should be illegal.
If you want to make an argument that “everything is AI now” go for it. But I’m happy to see existing false advertising laws evolve as technology evolves
If you use post editing tools like magic eraser and the new reframe / expand tools then that's a different story and shouldn't be allowed in real estate photography.
Unless you take into account their editing features that allow you to, for example, remove a human from an image